Subscribe to DSC Newsletter

Dow losing 600 points in a few minutes: no technical glitch, no foul play, but a natural cause?

Nobody will ever know the exact cause of this historic collapse (the largest intraday drop ever) followed by a recovery within a few minutes. It impacted several stock exchanges and most stocks, and the volume was heavy.

Possible causes:

Is it a terrorist plot? No, terrorists don't have this level of sophistication. Even if the terrorist was a trader in a major US bank.

Is it manipulation by the government to extract hundreds of billions of dollars to finance health care, the Greeks and other problems? I don't believe in this conspiracy theory, because the government also lacks the required level of sophistication.

Wall Street crooks? I don't think so. Did money really change hands? Maybe for a few minutes, but it's not like 500 billion dollars were "stolen" from ordinary investors and permanently transferred to a few large accounts. It's likely that the money came back to those who lost it (see my section on "probable cause" to understand why it came back).

Trading error? No trading error could produce such a drop.

Probable cause:

The stock market is driven by emotions. Behavioral analytic models explain swings and volatility. If you've been trading recently, chances are that (a week ago) you had many stop orders, and many short sell orders (more than ever before) ready for the largely expected moment when DOW goes back below 10,500. Also, you would have many limit (buy) orders when the DOW goes below 10,000 (it did on May 6). Chances are that most traders, small ordinary guys, big guys and automated trading bots and algorithms had these mechanisms in place based on human feelings associated with the recent spectacular recovery of the stock market over the last year.

With so many stop orders (and short sell orders), once we reach a tipping point (10,600) a cascading effect occurs naturally, resulting in the collapse. Think about the Titanic filling with water: it stayed afloat for 2 hours, then in a matter of minutes, it sank. The same thing occurred to DOW, with a similar time line. The difference is that DOW came back, because of the very numerous buy orders below 10,000.

In order to investigate the real cause of the collapse (whether it is natural or not), one has to look at the distribution of percentage drop for all major stocks. Since DOW lost 6 percents in a few minutes, if the cause is natural, you'd expect that on average, all stocks lost 6 percent. But there are thousands of stocks, so you would expect some (very few) will indeed go up, while some will lose more than 30% (Procter & Gamble).

How do we know if the 40% drop on Procter & Gamble is "natural" (being the most extreme drop for a large stock out of thousands spectacular drops), or not natural? To answer the question, one has to consider extreme value theory, or better, perform simulations. I have no doubt that with so many stocks and such a severe global drop, a few large stocks will experience a drop 2 or 3 times worse than average.

Views: 132

Replies to This Discussion

With the oil spill and the Greek contagion, members of Congress and others from the Clinton economic policy making machine who are driving the Obama agenda across the board are trying to blame a close to 5% loss in the Dow and similar fall across all the major global markets on a technical glitch. It is unlikely that this is the case though it merits looking into to beef up critical infrastructure protection in the advanced economies of the G7, though I would urge all major financial markets, emerging and advanced to safeguard their electronic trading infrastructures in their financial markets because, if it is indeed an intended attack it could be intergovernmental also or a self-attack. Nothing can be ruled out.

The issue at hand, however, is policy paralysis and economic ideology and if it is a self-attack it is a way to save face to change policy by creating a context. Please see my blog articles on my blog at:
I guess that the information that we have here (in Spain) is not so complete as the one that you have there. Someone is talking about an error in one operation: an order of selling 16.000 million dollars instead of 16 millions... But I don't really believe that this is the cause.

Maybe the real reason is to be found in the automatic trading strategies, using bots and similar... If DOW < 10.600, then sell all. In that case, my question would be: have these operative strategies something to do with the real reason of a stock market, i.e. an efficient resource allocation for financing enterprises? Is automatic speculation killing the real values of business? ...
Below is the % drop for 10 large stocks on May 6.

- 1st column = stock symbol
- 2nd column = price at open
- 3rd column = low price on May 6
- 4th column = % drop between open and low

The % drop ranges from +5.7% to +22.8% drop when computed on just 10 (randomly selected) stocks. If you compute the drop on 1,000 (randomly selected) stocks, you should expect the drop to range between -1% and +40%. This supports the assumption that the collapse was entirely natural (that is: no foul play, no technical glitch).

I would expect, if the cause is natural (as suspected), that you would see tons of stocks experiencing a 7-13% drop, while few would experience a drop outside this range. A non natural cause would translate into a large gap in the drop distribution -- e.g. something like 85% of large stocks experiencing a drop between 7-13 %, and 15% having a drop above 30%.

GE $18.00 $15.15 15.8%
MSFT $29.59 $27.91 5.7%
GOOG $508.75 $460.00 9.6%
T $25.71 $24.04 6.5%
MRK $35.41 $30.70 13.3%
C $4.20 $3.90 7.1%
F $12.17 $10.59 13.0%
K $54.60 $52.50 3.8%
M $22.42 $21.22 5.4%
AAPL $258.25 $199.25 22.8%


On Data Science Central

© 2020   TechTarget, Inc.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service