Subscribe to DSC Newsletter

Google Analytics vs. Urchin 6.0 -- which is better for enterprise analytics?

My company's interactive agency has suggested that, instead of Google Analytics, we should utilize Urchin 6.0. They claim that it's more suited for enterprise-class analytics.

I've already been reading some material about the differences between the two, but am interested to know what you think.

For instance, the Urchin features page states that it cannot collect information through tags. Although Vincent made a good point (in another thread, stating that server logs and tagging bring the best of both worlds), I'm now hesitant to proceed with a solution that might not provide specific, granular information that tagging (presumably) provides.

So ... is Urchin really better for enterprise-class analytics? Is it "better" than GA?

Thank in advance,
Dave

dave (dot) morse (at) gmail (dot) com

Tags: analytics, google, urchin, web

Views: 58

On Data Science Central

© 2019   AnalyticBridge.com is a subsidiary and dedicated channel of Data Science Central LLC   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service